Warning: Class '\Joomla\CMS\Document\Renderer\Html\ModulesRenderer' not found in /home/pipingde/public_html/libraries/loader.php on line 648
Piping Designers . com - Blog 1A: Piping Experience Vs 3D Cad abilities

You do not appear to be logged in? Members can Set up a Profile, Comment on Articles, Use the Forum and Download Tools. Login or Register Today


Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/pipingde/public_html/plugins/content/prizmimage/prizmimage.php on line 45

Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/pipingde/public_html/templates/rt_anacron/html/com_content/article/default.php on line 18

The Piping Blog

 

To train to use any given 3D software, would take a piping designer no more than about 2 weeks to learn.
To train a 3D CAD operator with minimal piping experience, to become a senior piper, however will take a LOT longer!  

The thoughts, ideas, concepts and opinions contained in this article are my rambling thoughts ... you may or may not agree with any or all of it, but its's a debate that goes on and on.
The training times described in the this article may vary from company to company, and individual to individual
The information in this article is not intended to be the last and only definitive word on the subject of Piping Experience Vs 3D CAD abilities.
These are simply my thoughts on the subject.  

In a previous article, "Blog 1C: Thoughts on Job Descriptions", James O. Pennock (JOP) outlines his concept of 'Pay Scale' job descriptions and 'Functional' job assignments for piping designers.

Using JOPs table, we can see what it takes in terms of training, on the job experience, supervision, mentor ship and hard work,to go from being a Piping Designer III, or Junior Piping Designer to attaining the level of Principle or Lead Piping Designer ... if that's a role to which you aspire.

But lets talk about the elephant in the room ... 3D CAD.

A gripe many pipers have, is that regardless of their piping training or years of experience, they often get overlooked in their search for jobs because of their lack of experience with a given software.
We can debate what software is better, bigger, faster, etc., but that's not at issue here.
I have seen plenty examples of "veteran" pipers getting over looked in preference to younger, less experienced pipers, because they haven't used package xyz.
What is the logical progression of this type of hiring policy?
To train to use any given 3D software, would take a piping designer no more than about 2 weeks to learn, throw in a couple more weeks on the job using the software, and that piping designer has all the experience he needs to take his piping knowledge and apply it in a 3D cad environment.

This is not a fanciful idea.
Pipers, even pipers who previously have had only 2D experience, think in 3D, they've been doing it since before 3D CAD systems were invented.
Take a piper that has 3D cad experience, on a different software, and that training time is even less.
To train a 3D CAD operator with minimal piping experience, to become a senior piper, however will take, conservatively, 9 years ... assuming there is anyone left to train them.  

At present (2014), the piping industry, worldwide, has suffered badly from the effects of the global financial crises (GFC), with many companies, across multiple sectors unwilling to invest in growth, development or new projects.
While there is renewed growth in these sectors, it is not where it once was.Companies are under even greater pressure, nowadays, to keep budgets lean, minimize over heads and win projects in a very competitive environment. 
Typically, we are seeing training as being a casualty in all this.
Companies want new employees to hit the ground running, they don't want to spend money on software training, they don't want to employ seasoned professionals on high rates, just to train them in their newest software.
There is also a reluctance to employ "junior" staff, and train them as designers from scratch - how do you justify a high charge out rate on junior personnel?
And do you want your senior staff booking overhead hours to train juniors, when they should be racking up the hours on high charge out rates?

It goes back to that old argument: 
"What if we train them and they leave?"
"What if we don't train them, and they stay?"

One of the biggest casualties from the GFC, was experience.
The few jobs that were available, required "ready to hit the ground running" type employees.
 Recruiters, tasked with finding the right personnel, were told to find a piper with 20 years experience who can use software XYZ. 
When the recruiters came back empty handed, the were told to find a piper who can use software XYZ.
This left the piper with 25 or 30 years experience "on the bench".

If that piper had only 5 or 6 years to go, before planning to retire, that piper stopped being a piper, and did something else until he retired - now who trains the junior piper?

This is a subject that not only affects Senior Pipers, but has a massive impact on the future of Piping Design as a recognizable discipline - without guidance and mentor ship from senior piping designers, junior designers, if they are ever given an opportunity, will not get the level of training and experience that they deserve and need.

Companies / Employers need to take a long term view on training.
Sure, you might train pipers, and some might, after 5 or 6 years, leave, to broaden their horizons or chase the big bucks, but that should be happening with every company ... you can always replace them with someone equally well trained by another company.
Junior pipers, while learning from senior pipers, got great training, valuable experience and the benefit of real world job skill that they can, literally, take anywhere.
They also provide the company with great benefits - cheap labour, adaptable staff, quick to learn new software and someone to do the dirty work ... anyone want to backdraft a P&ID? 
Why send 2 senior pipers on site for a survey, when a junior can hold the dumb end of the tape, climb on to the rack, walkdown a line as well as anyone - and at a fraction of the cost.

If companies do not continue (or restart) to train juniors, they are biting the hand that feeds them.
A world without piping designers?
I can guarantee that there are very few things in this world that are manufactured with out the use of a piping system somewhere in their production train.
I am eager to hear your thoughts on the subject.


About the Author

Anton

Anton Dooley is a Piper with over 25 years experience covering process plant engineering, design & training. He is the founder of pipingdesigners.com

Log in to comment

COM_KUNENA_TOPIC Blog 1A: Piping Experience Vs 3D Cad abilities

Posted: 10 months 1 week ago by Anton #9194
Anton's Avatar
Bumping this back up for those who missed it!
Posted: 2 years 5 months ago by Caroline Conway #8947
Caroline Conway's Avatar
I've primarily used two different software suites. Catia and Autodesk. Between those two, I can transition to almost anything. Solidworks for mechanical is just CATIA sketcher, broken out on its own. Microstation is similar to CATIA also. Autodesk keeps it's command structure pretty stable from flat 2D to most of its 3D applications (Plant 3D and MEP).

The HARDEST thing to do is to train someone to "think in 3D". I've never had a problem with that, even when doing 2D work. But, try training someone who's whole background has been as a 2D cad jockey. Sure they pick up on the software quickly, but they don't get the ins and outs of a 3D way of thinking.

As I said in my post on LinkedIn, I'm ready to get out of the business and go sling hamburgers. There's no jobs out there for someone who doesn't fit the pigeonhole of whatever it is the employer wants, the hiring powers that be don't think outside the box and realize that someone with 15+ years' experience can do just about any job set before them. Us oldtimers are more than willing to learn, heck, a GOOD piper never stops learning. We build our reference books, we know where to find information, we go get the information.

Oh well...
Posted: 2 years 6 months ago by Laster #8900
Laster's Avatar
Hi Anton,
I very much agree with your article. Many in our profession have spent the Drafting machine to the computer.
For many engineers, by request, is run projects PDS, PDMS, AutoCAD, CADWorx, MicroStation, Catia .... with Office, Databases ... etc.
Not being most compatible software design forces us to an almost continuous training.
Young people have more skill in its use, but we are losing the specific knowledge of piping. The real experts will retire.
Professional becoming more scarce and it is true that, on the other hand, new arrivals are capable of generating a fly in 3D, with textures and shadows but have drawn a fly, not a valve. Neither know why they have to put certain items, or many other concepts as we know, it takes many years to achieve.
I think it's a problem of almost all Engineerings, regardless of their country.
Sorry for the translation.
Posted: 2 years 6 months ago by Anton #8899
Anton's Avatar
Hi Garzabla1,

I know where you are coming from with your hiding behind "back in my day" statements.
But, as you, I and countless others know and realise, "Back in my day" was not today or yesterday, and very quickly, those who persist with that attitude will be left behind, and find it difficult to stay gainfully employed.
That's true in and industry, and is not limited to those pipers with grey hair!
Software evolves, technology evolves, the industry evolves - and we better make sure we evolve with it, or we go the way of the Dodo.

I like the "Pipers Hall of Fame" idea, and I can think of some candidates already ... it would be a nice way to acknowledge those pipers who have helped make the industry what it is today ... and the "war stories" that often go with them are legendary!

Lets look into it.
Posted: 2 years 7 months ago by Garzabla1 #8884
Garzabla1's Avatar
Hi Anton,
I agree with your assessment but it also has to be said that there is still a degree of CAD resentment and nonacceptance amongst some of the grey haired Pipers of which I am one. They don't like it or understand it and fear it , in some cases they even refuse to use it. It's understandable when you come from a generation when black & white TV and rotary dial phones where Hi-Tech
I guess it's all in your attitude and whether you can accept change as you grow older or just hide behind "back in my day" statements.
Personally I love it although I was never formally trained in any system, like you say it's not really that hard and can be picked up by anyone with a logical brain in a few weeks.

Whilst on the subject of grey hairs it's sad to say that hardly a month goes by without me hearing of the passing of another of the great Pipers, some of these guys were truly legends in their own time, often for their drinking abilities as much as their piping abilities, but in an age when those two abilities were synonymous.

I was wondering whether you'd ever thought of starting a Pipers Hall of Fame on Piping Designers.com to remember these guys. It could consist of a nomination and a seconding process and go on to include our fond recollections and moderated stories associated with these great characters.

When we met in Calgary last summer you were out here scouting for a Project for Ausenco?? did that ever work out or are you back in Ireland now? I finally got work at TransCanada Pipelines, not my kind of work but it couldn't have come at a better time with the looming recession in Calgary.. 5 years work at least & $42 billion dollars worth of work ! Who cares what a barrel is worth, when it still costs the same to move it .

Alan
Posted: 2 years 11 months ago by Anton #8771
Anton's Avatar
Comments?
Moderators: Jop

 

 

We have 17473 guests and 3 members online

Company News Feeds

Company News Feeds

You are not logged in.

Search

}());