Reducing Flange

  • newdam07
  • newdam07's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #8400 by newdam07
Reducing Flange was created by newdam07
Hi!

This sounds unusual but the process is requiring a 6" x 5" reduction of the line and it is indicated to use a 6"x5" 300lb. reducing weldneck flange. I already searched online and ASME B16.5 for the dimensions but could not find a direct answer. Can anyone help me with this....thanks!

Adam

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #7055 by Jop
Replied by Jop on topic Re: Reducing Flange
I have never heard of such a requirement in all of my piping history. Before you (or I) proceed on this we need to pin the Process Engineer down on the reason for such a seemingly unreasonable requirement. I don't mean "because he said so" but a real definable, logical and valid reason. This is going to be costly.
Questions:
- What is the commodity?
- What is the Operating Pressure and Temperature?
- What Type of Unit and Plant is this?
- What type of equipment is upstream of this requirement?
- What type of equipment is down stream of this requirement?

Do it once and Do it Right

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • newdam07
  • newdam07's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #7056 by newdam07
Replied by newdam07 on topic Re: Reducing Flange
There's a catalyst in the line, 320 °F, 5 psig. The line is coming from a reactor then sloping down a vessel. After the slope, there is a vertical section going to the nozzle. The reducing flange is at the vertical section. I believe the reason they specified the reducing flange is because the height of the reactor is set and the slope is already at the optimum and the unit is modularized.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #7057 by Jop
Replied by Jop on topic Re: Reducing Flange
Well you provided a lot more information but it does not answer the question and sounded like it all came from you not the Process Engineer.
Please try to get the process engineer to answer the previous questions and these:
- Is the Reactor above the other equipment?
- Is the 5" nozzle on the bottom of the Reactor?
- What is the distance from the Reactor to the next piece of equipment?
- Is the next piece of equipment a Regenerator? or a catalyst holding bin?

Do it once and Do it Right

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #7058 by 11echo
Replied by 11echo on topic Re: Reducing Flange
www.kerkau.com/LiteratureRetrieve.aspx?ID=165325 ...Page 16

Reducing flanges are "normally" the same length as the standard flange, just the hub diameter has been reduced. Looks like you could go down to 2 1/2" (from 6") with a reducing flange. However this flange is real "odd-ball", I suggest you read my comments about odd-ball piping components at this link

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3172 ...Good Luck!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • newdam07
  • newdam07's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #7059 by newdam07
Replied by newdam07 on topic Re: Reducing Flange
Jop,
The Process Engineer is the licensor. We can ask the licensor but it would take time before they respond (if ever they respond). My scope is the regenerator section and our client just provided us with the coordinate to tie-in. The Reactor section is done by a different contractor, so I do not have the information about the nozzle. I believe there are 4-stack Reactors and the line going to the regenerator section is coming from the farthest reactor. The next piece of equipment after the Reactor is a Sulfur stripper vessel with a high temperature, around 1200 °F.

Adam

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Jop
Time to create page: 0.291 seconds