The "DARK SIDE" of a project! ...CONSTRUCTION!

  • 11echo
  • 11echo's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #7955 by 11echo
SO anybody see any “issues” with the drain header in these pic.s?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #5833 by AbhijitN
Really strange piping .!
I think there might be process requirement here & at construction site we see only the final drawings issued for construction. What happend to come to this decision we never know at site....Have u asked design, that 'why it is done this way??'

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #6155 by shrivallabha
Replied by shrivallabha on topic Re: The "DARK SIDE" of a project! ...CONSTRUCTION!
1. What was on the Isometric material list? Lateral Tee.
2. If so, then how come shop issued:
a. Regular Tee
b. 45° Elbow
There has to be some explanation for the issuing the material that was not on the iso-material-list.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 11echo
  • 11echo's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #6157 by 11echo
This was one of those "HOT" projects ...trying to meet an EPA deadline, the entire piping was fabricated on site. I still haven't heard an explaination on this, but the client decided that it was "OK" as-is. One "Golden Rule" that over rides anything in this industry is ..."He who has all the gold, makes all the rules"! ...The other rule that levels everything out is ..."IF the clients happy, then you "should" be happy"!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #6159 by shrivallabha
Replied by shrivallabha on topic Re: The "DARK SIDE" of a project! ...CONSTRUCTION!

This was one of those "HOT" projects ...trying to meet an EPA deadline, the entire piping was fabricated on site. I still haven't heard an explaination on this, but the client decided that it was "OK" as-is. One "Golden Rule" that over rides anything in this industry is ..."He who has all the gold, makes all the rules"! ...The other rule that levels everything out is ..."IF the clients happy, then you "should" be happy"!


You are correct about it. After all, client shells out the money.

However, the client wouldn't be so happy if he understood the implications like you did. Maybe they ignored. They say "Ignorance is bliss" and now I realize it is true. But it is very good (no pun) example for all Design persons.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 6 months ago - 12 years 6 months ago #6466 by cadmanpete
When I looked at the photos my first question was why are they not using wye's (laterals) instead of the tee and 45 combo. I don't see how anyone could say that this practice was cost effective or material effective. The only reason I can see this as every even happening is a long lead time on procuring wye's. Not cost effective. Not design effective. I know if many instances in the states most inspectors won't even sign off of it thus forcing the contractor to cut it apart and start over which really should be the case here anyway.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Jop
Time to create page: 0.242 seconds