- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by .
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Home » Topics » Piping Design » The Technical Forum » Control Valve Assemblies
Hi Mick,
I agree with you, I would normally offset the bypass to ensure that the removal of the CV is not fouled by the bypass pipework – after all, one of the reasons for having a bypass is to allow maintenance on the CV.
Now – why this isn’t addressed in literature, is something I can’t answer, but I would expect that a seasoned piper with be looking at access and maintenance as part of his/her design, in much the same way as we would allow for pulling tube bundles from an exchanger, or agitator removal from a vessel.
This is one of many reasons, that a piping project requires that senior level experienced pipers are employed, rather than just cad operators.
Not everything that we do is covered by a code, standard, work instruction, manual etc … somethings require the experience of a senior level piper.
Anton
Copyright © 2024 pipingdesigners.com | Powered by a piping designer