Hernan Rizza

Let other Pipers know:

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1414
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    Sorry I think the problem was if the suffix S for CS is correct… I’m also agree with buying a pipe using a nominal thickness if the commercial sch do not apply with what I need. Is very common in high pressure.

    #1409
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    B16.10 is a valve specification, nothing to do here. On the other hand there is a lot of things that are not well defined in “the market”. If you want to see which is the correct way to order some product, you have to look in each specification, for example in A 312 (SS pipe) qty / name / process / grade / size, etc. That specification refers you to ASME B36.19 for pipe sch.

    Check in ASME B36.10 which is the STANDARD FOR PRODUCT SIZES in SS pipe, near the end of the specification.

    #1401
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    No, sorry. I’m not a specialist in corrosion.

    Bye.

    #1393
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    Yes. And the use of 316 is going to be subjcet to the mechanical requirements, for example, forget that material for an API10000 valve.

    Try http://www.dataindustrial.com/pdf/techn … 92702W.pdf

    Bye

    #1390
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    First, each company has their own criteria, this is a fact, the reasons are many (e.g. weather were they have their plants, national regulations, local markets, etc), in second, they are options for different things. With an o’let in high pressure you probably are going to have a very high heat input in the weld, not with the TEE (you have much more complication if you are thinking in use a 45°branch), but on the other hand if you have a big run and a small branch and you want to use TEE red. and another red… and so on, your spool piece is going to be very big with no sense because you could use an o’let reducing the space. One important thing is that the most part of companies that construct this kind of pieces not have their engineering designs studies and they copy from others very well known that have the studies of each part. Remember that these pieces are non std. and there are no ASME/ANSI that regulate their design. I think that using a TEE or a TEE red. up to one half of the NPS of the run is the best option, if you have less, you could think in an o’let branch.

    #1389
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    Jop, why mix things?. It is wrong to use an S in a carbon steel sch, but… up to NPS8 is the same 40 and 40S, the same for 80 and 80S. Then you have to check in some chart.

    #1388
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    gpsvn, if you are requiring carbide tungsten is because you have a metal-metal ball seat in your ESDV. Probably you have carbide tungsten in the ball and in the seat, and if you use carbide tungsten only in the seat and bare 316ss in the ball you are going to have the galling there. So, I think that 316 is ok for seat and ball but if you are going to use a metal-metal seat you have to use carbide tungsten in both sides.

    #1355
    Hernan Rizza
    Participant

    Anton, I alredy had that page, but thanks for your try.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)